Hits: 26

Theories in science will be almost constantly changing. Earlier, atoms were considered as indivisible in Dalton’s atomic model. As new theories emerge, old theories will be modified or rejected. But if an experiment is done in hurry and wrong results are announced without analyzing, then it leads to creating a hurdle in progress of science. Some examples:
1] A galaxy having no dark matter was claimed to have been ‘found’ making big news. But now it is debunked.
2] In an experiment, it was concluded that neutrinos will travel faster than speed of light in vacuum. Later it was termed as experimental error.
In my view, experiments must be conducted several times in different methods and results should be announced after complete analysis to avoid confusion. What is your view?